[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: zlib vs gzip

From: Jack Lloyd
Subject: Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: zlib vs gzip
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 11:44:43 -0400
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.11

On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 08:40:44AM -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> On Oct 31, 2007 8:30 AM, Jack Lloyd <address@hidden> wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 08:00:11AM -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> > > I'd like to point out that the #1 easiest thing anyone could do right
> > > now to speed up monotone is get hand-optimized assembly SHA1
> > > implementations into our copy of botan.  That one function shows up as
> > > at least 7% of runtime every single time I profile it, doesn't matter
> > > what the task is.
> >
> > Oh: and how can one go about properly profiling monotone?
> I have been using either valgrind (calltree mode) or good
> old-fashioned gprof (the latter works much better if you install
> profiling versions of libc, libstdc++, and libz).

I meant more what would be an appropriate mtn run to profile (commits?
run a server process for a while? is there something I can hook into
the test system?)


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]