[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Monotone-devel] Bogus merge with 0.38

From: Timothy Brownawell
Subject: Re: [Monotone-devel] Bogus merge with 0.38
Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2008 18:17:26 -0600

On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 10:51 +1100, William Uther wrote:
> ii) Why is revision 0000000000000000000000000000000000000004 in both  
> the marks of the file and the uncommon ancestor set?  I assume this is  
> a bogus revision ID?  (It is technically vaild, just... unlikely.  Can  
> you mtn log --from 0000...0004?)

We use fake revision ids for update. I think it's because our normal
marking code expects everything to be in the db, but when updating one
of the parents isn't.


Free (experimental) public monotone hosting:

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]