Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: mtn:// sync

[Thomas Moschny]

Derek Scherger wrote:
> Markus Schiltknecht wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thomas Moschny wrote:
> >> Ok. I vaguely had in mind that there also was a non-technical reason.
> >
> > I don't know any non-technical reason.
>
> I believe it's a consequence of the invariant enforced by the database
> that no revision will be stored unless it's parents are also stored.
> This ultimately requires that all ancestry for a revision is in the
> local database before the revision can be stored.

This is clear. But the question was, is there a non-technical reason to not 
sync the branch certs of these ancestor revisions?

Regards,
Thomas

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.