[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Undo a commit
From: |
Ludovic Brenta |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Undo a commit |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Oct 2008 18:29:50 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) |
Daniel Carrera writes:
> mtn rebase <rev>
OK, that's an improvement on my proposal.
> The command "db kill_rev_locally" is long so I don't like it. What
> would be the consequences of a divergence? Is it ok if I simply run
> "mtn rebase" and then go on merrily on my way making my other
> branches? If so, then I would be entirely happy with rebase.
After "mtn rebase p:", there are two ways you could create a
divergence:
$ mtn commit
creates a second head in the same branch; later on, "mtn checkout",
"mtn update" and other commands will complain that there are two heads
and require you to select a head manually. You can resolve that
either with "mtn merge", "mtn suspend" or "mtn disapprove"; it's up to
you. This is sometimes called "light-weight" branching; it is
appropriate for short-lived divergences that you intend to resolve at
one point in the future.
The second way is:
$ mtn commit -b new_branch
The divergence is then "permanent"; you now have two branches with one
head each; monotone will not complain about that. You can still merge
whenever you want with "mtn propagate". This is sometimes called
"heavy-weight" branching and is for intentional divergences that you
think should live for a while (e.g. stable/maintenance
vs. unstable/development).
Note that "heavy-weight" is not that heavy; the only difference is the
value of the "branch" cert. So "heavy-weight" does not consume any
additional space in the database compared to "light-weight"; but it
does consume from the branch namespace.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Undo a commit, (continued)
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Undo a commit, Daniel Carrera, 2008/10/09
- [Monotone-devel] Re: Undo a commit, Ludovic Brenta, 2008/10/10
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Undo a commit, Thomas Keller, 2008/10/10
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Undo a commit, Daniel Carrera, 2008/10/10
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Undo a commit, Ludovic Brenta, 2008/10/10
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Undo a commit, Daniel Carrera, 2008/10/10
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Undo a commit, Ludovic Brenta, 2008/10/10
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Undo a commit, Daniel Carrera, 2008/10/10
- [Monotone-devel] Re: Undo a commit, Ludovic Brenta, 2008/10/10
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Undo a commit, Daniel Carrera, 2008/10/10
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Undo a commit,
Ludovic Brenta <=
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Undo a commit, Daniel Carrera, 2008/10/10
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Undo a commit, Daniel Carrera, 2008/10/10
- [Monotone-devel] Re: Undo a commit, Bruce Stephens, 2008/10/10
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Undo a commit, Ludovic Brenta, 2008/10/10
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Undo a commit, Daniel Carrera, 2008/10/10
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Undo a commit, Ludovic Brenta, 2008/10/10
- [Monotone-devel] Re: Undo a commit, Bruce Stephens, 2008/10/10
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Undo a commit, Daniel Carrera, 2008/10/10
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Undo a commit, Daniel Atallah, 2008/10/10
- [Monotone-devel] Re: Undo a commit, Bruce Stephens, 2008/10/10