[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Nano-devel] Nano ported to nsr-tandem-nsk.
From: |
Bates, Tom |
Subject: |
RE: [Nano-devel] Nano ported to nsr-tandem-nsk. |
Date: |
Wed, 3 Mar 2004 16:29:00 -0600 |
Hi David,
(1): Yes I missed it. Thanks.
(2): I moved "floss.h" to "nano.h" and it works fine.
- Tom
-----Original Message-----
From: David L. Ramsey [mailto:address@hidden
Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2004 10:52 AM
To: Bates, Tom
Cc: address@hidden
Subject: Re: [Nano-devel] Nano ported to nsr-tandem-nsk.
>Please accept the diffs below.
>
>Thanks,
>Tom Bates
Thank you. I can get this into nano 1.3.2. However, I have two quick
questions first:
1. There's one snippet of code in rcfile.c that assumes that the user id
for root is 0 that your patch doesn't cover. Is this an oversight?
2. Does floss.h have to be included at the top of nano.c? I only ask
because I'd like to keep the platform-specific #defines in nano.h
whenever possible. Will the port still work properly if floss.h is
included at the top of nano.h (after the NANO_H include guard) instead?
I've come up with a slightly modified version of your patch, against
current 1.3.1-cvs, that covers the rcfile.c case and includes floss.h in
nano.h. It's attached if you want to test it to see if it still works.