[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nano-devel] useless include ?
From: |
David Lawrence Ramsey |
Subject: |
Re: [Nano-devel] useless include ? |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Sep 2004 19:00:38 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i |
Sorry for the delay in responding; I've been busy.
--- Mike Frysinger <address@hidden> wrote:
<snip>
>the first parameter to AC_TRY_RUN() would never be utilized in a
>cross-compiling scenario ... so if you have nested AC_TRY_RUN()'s in
>the first param, you can just 'ignore' them ... add the 4th parameter
>to the first AC_TRY_RUN() and everything should be golden
Okay; thanks for the info. The fourth parameter of the first
AC_TRY_RUN() is indeed set in the last patch I sent you (which is now in
CVS), but the nested AC_TRY_RUN()s are in the second parameter, since
they're run only if the test in the first parameter fails. Is that
golden too?
>personally i dislike slang intensely so i just always disable it :)
I don't like it much myself either.