Re: [Nano-devel] (no subject)

[Jim's Bugs]

Sorry for the delay.  Finding the problem was, I'm afraid,
mostly self-interest: our students keep killing our servers
with hung nano processes.  Anyway, finally getting back to
this I see that nano 1.3.6 has been released with the
input==ERR patch - I've tried it on both OpenBSD/vax 3.6 and
Debian woody on an ultrasparc.  Nano dies gracefully on both
when the parent shell is killed.  Looking at the man pages
on a couple of the OSes suggests ERR is the correct constant
to test for - EOF was my foolish assumption (I saw -1 in
gdb).  In any case, thanks very much for fixing the bug.

        Jim Uhl

On 8-Mar-05, at 9:53 AM, David Lawrence Ramsey wrote:

> ...  Would you mind
> checking it out and seeing whether it works for you too?  Thanks again.
>
> >I believe fixing this bug will also fix the following two bug reports
> >in Debian and Red Hat, respectively:
> >
> >http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=286781
> >https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=124500
>
> It looks that way.