[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nano-devel] Nano 1.3.8 and 1.3.8-cvs crashes on suse 9.3 x86_64
From: |
Simon Strandman |
Subject: |
Re: [Nano-devel] Nano 1.3.8 and 1.3.8-cvs crashes on suse 9.3 x86_64 |
Date: |
Thu, 11 Aug 2005 11:44:15 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) |
David Lawrence Ramsey skrev:
Thanks for the report and the link, in any case. How does current CVS
behave? I imagine that renumbering won't be done properly in all cases
due to the above problem, but at least it shouldn't segfault.
It still segfaults. :( This is the new bt:
#0 0x00002aaaaad90253 in malloc_consolidate () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6
#1 0x00002aaaaad92002 in _int_malloc () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6
#2 0x00002aaaaad93719 in malloc () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6
#3 0x0000000000412556 in nmalloc (howmuch=1230) at utils.c:346
#4 0x000000000041443e in statusbar (msg=0x41ac9f "Search Wrapped") at
winio.c:2943
#5 0x000000000040e0b0 in findnextstr (can_display_wrap=true,
wholeword=false, no_sameline=false, begin=0x710e90, begin_x=6,
needle=0x712490 "qwerty", needle_len=0x0) at search.c:362
#6 0x000000000040efe2 in do_search () at search.c:453
#7 0x000000000040c857 in do_input (meta_key=<value optimized out>,
func_key=0x7fffffffddbc, s_or_t=0x7fffffffddbd, ran_func=0x7fffffffddbe,
finished=0x7fffffffddbf, allow_funcs=true) at nano.c:1679
#8 0x000000000040cd02 in main (argc=1, argv=0x7fffffffe2f8) at nano.c:2425
--
Simon Strandman <address@hidden>