[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nano-devel] [PATCH] Update gentoo.nanorc
From: |
Mike Frysinger |
Subject: |
Re: [Nano-devel] [PATCH] Update gentoo.nanorc |
Date: |
Mon, 26 Jan 2009 18:50:33 -0500 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.10.3 (Linux/2.6.28; KDE/4.1.3; x86_64; ; ) |
On Monday 26 January 2009 18:16:43 Davide Pesavento wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 23:58, Mike Frysinger <address@hidden> wrote:
> > On Monday 26 January 2009 16:07:15 Davide Pesavento wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 01:34, Mike Frysinger <address@hidden> wrote:
> >> > On Saturday 24 January 2009 12:57:19 Davide Pesavento wrote:
> >> >> please consider the attached patch for inclusion.
> >> >> It expands the Gentoo syntax highlighting file with many new
> >> >> definitions.
> >> >
> >> > the QA_.* match is overly complicated. i would just match
> >> > [-[:alnum:]] rather than trying to maintain a valid keyword list.
> >>
> >> Why shouldn't we be more precise if it's possible? And I don't think
> >> the list of valid arches will change so often...
> >
> > that depends on how much steam the ports guys pick up. i dont think it's
> > a big deal here, and we want to avoid the cascade issue of having to
> > update a lot of little places every time the list changes. if it were
> > possible, nano would key off of arch.list like most other things.
>
> Do you mean that nano should take the list of valid arches from
> arch.list? Is that possible?
i mean if it were possible, it should. but it isnt possible today (and i dont
think worth the effort), so just accept any value in there.
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.