Re: [Nano-devel] making tiny nano tinier

[Benno Schulenberg]

On Thu, Apr 3, 2014, at 16:55, Chris Allegretta wrote:
> On 3/27/14, Benno Schulenberg <address@hidden> wrote:
> > But nowadays, wouldn't it make sense to let --enable-tiny disable
> > *all* features by default, also colour, nanorc and multiple buffers?
> > Which one can then override with selected --enable-something for
> > wanted features?
> 
> This was actually the intention all along, and it sounds like what has
> happened is as with most things accidental and not intentional.

Okay, good to know.

Currently there are several occurrences of this:

#if !defined(NANO_TINY) && defined(ENABLE_NANORC)

Should these all be replaced with a simple

#ifdef ENABLE_NANORC

to allow --enable-tiny to be overridden by --enable-nanorc?


(And later on it would then have to change to

#ifndef DISABLE_NANORC

for consistency.)

Benno

-- 
http://www.fastmail.fm - Faster than the air-speed velocity of an
                          unladen european swallow