[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Nano-devel] the difficulties of behaving similar

From: Benno Schulenberg
Subject: [Nano-devel] the difficulties of behaving similar
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 21:48:15 +0200

Hi Mark,

On Sun, Jun 15, 2014, at 22:36, Benno Schulenberg wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 15, 2014, at 16:40, Mark Majeres wrote:
> > Please try this version.
> Looking good.  Can't find anything wrong with it this quickly.  :)
> Will test some more, and then likely merge it in a couple of days.

It is good, but... there is still one difference between cutting
and copying: any toggle will not break a series of ^K (as was
recently decided and implemented), but it will break a series
of M-6 (your ^C).  And I totally don't understand why...

Or... maybe this cutbuffer_reset() in add_undo() shouldn't
be there?  If I remove it, I can't find anything wrong any
more.  Do you agree that that is the right thing?

(See attached cleaned up patch.)


-- - A no graphics, no pop-ups email service

Attachment: newcutbuffer.patch
Description: Text Data

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]