[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Nano-devel] polished git repo

From: Chris Allegretta
Subject: Re: [Nano-devel] polished git repo
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 10:51:17 -0400

Hey Mike, how are we looking for a transition on 4/1?  If there are
steps you'd like me to take (aside from the website etc updates) just
say the word.

Oh, what path should I be putting in the website info for the new git
path - is it for the website
and git:// for checkouts?

On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 11:14 AM, Chris Allegretta <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 2:35 AM, Jordi Mallach <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Well, it's the git way. In git there's author, reviewer, committer,
>> etc., so a big transition like this is nice to have using a more git-
>> like commit message that starts the real-git history.
> I assume letting Mike commit these patches himself alleviates much of
> the urgency here as it should be carrier over from SVN.
>> I'm unsure we need to stitch the switch to git to a nice version
>> number. gnulib and git are both implementation details of nano, not
>> actual front-end, user oriented bits that are going to be noticed at
>> all in nano. In fact, after the gnulib change, nano will be mostly the
>> same binary, right? But I really don't care about that. I think it's
>> better to take advantage of Mike's work and go ahead with the switch to
>> git ASAP, now that we're in a good position to do it.
> ...
>> We probably want to go over the website and repo docs that reference
>> SVN before the switch.
> Yup, let's plan to do this on 4/1 then, as it is a fun day to make big
> changes and will give me some time to get my things updated.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]