[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Nano-devel] RFC: should nano stay alive on anorexic terminals?
From: |
Benno Schulenberg |
Subject: |
[Nano-devel] RFC: should nano stay alive on anorexic terminals? |
Date: |
Fri, 08 Jul 2016 14:01:22 +0200 |
I'd never noticed, because for some reason Gnome-Terminal cannot be
made narrower than 19 columns, but when a virtual terminal becomes
narrower than four columns, nano crashes -- it dies deliberately,
possibly leaving an annoying .save and .swp fille lying around.
Other console editors don't die when the terminal gets very narrow:
Vim and Emacs and joe all stay alive. Vim and joe continue outputting
to the screen always; Emacs stops doing that when the terminal is
narrower than six columns.
What should nano do?
Benno
--
http://www.fastmail.com - A no graphics, no pop-ups email service
- [Nano-devel] RFC: should nano stay alive on anorexic terminals?,
Benno Schulenberg <=