nano-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Nano-devel] RFC: should nano stay alive on anorexic terminals?


From: Benno Schulenberg
Subject: [Nano-devel] RFC: should nano stay alive on anorexic terminals?
Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2016 14:01:22 +0200

I'd never noticed, because for some reason Gnome-Terminal cannot be
made narrower than 19 columns, but when a virtual terminal becomes
narrower than four columns, nano crashes -- it dies deliberately,
possibly leaving an annoying .save and .swp fille lying around.

Other console editors don't die when the terminal gets very narrow:
Vim and Emacs and joe all stay alive.  Vim and joe continue outputting
to the screen always; Emacs stops doing that when the terminal is
narrower than six columns.

What should nano do?

Benno

-- 
http://www.fastmail.com - A no graphics, no pop-ups email service




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]