[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nano-devel] the sample nanorc file among the docs
From: |
Benno Schulenberg |
Subject: |
Re: [Nano-devel] the sample nanorc file among the docs |
Date: |
Sun, 23 Oct 2016 17:25:45 +0200 |
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016, at 13:08, Jordi Mallach wrote:
> El dg 23 de 10 de 2016 a les 12:18 +0200, en/na Benno Schulenberg va
> escriure:
> > Now the question is: should I remove the above mention from
> > the nanorc.5 man page? (But that would mean that you would
> > have to patch it back in.) Or should I add nanorc.sample in
> > Makefile.am to the files that get installed by default into
> > /usr/share/doc/nano/?
> >
> > I am tending toward the latter option. Although one might argue
> > that the existence of /etc/nanorc itself is sample enough.
>
> I tend towards the former. I find it ackward that packages install such
> random docs, or I'm not used to it. Ie I don't expect make install to
> do anything about the README, etc., just about info, man, sphinx and
> the like. I'd remove it, Debian users know where to look for nano docs
> in general.
Okay. The reference has been removed in git, 3ed5ddb.
Benno
--
http://www.fastmail.com - A no graphics, no pop-ups email service