Re: [Nano-devel] RFC: should nano respond to a SIGCONT?

[David Ramsey]

On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 1:29 PM, Benno Schulenberg
<address@hidden> wrote:
> This doesn't actually do anything, because apparently ttyname is never
> NULL.  Putting in some more print statements, it results that after
> receiving a SIGCONT during suspension, nano goes back to sleep in
> endwin().  It seems that endwin() contains code that checks whether
> stdin is connected to anything.
>
> See attached patch for another try.

Also seems to work well.

> This trick won't work under Slang, but there are already several
> things that don't work right with Slang.  Support for Slang is really
> only being kept for Jordi, who needs it for tiny nano.

And there are only so many ways to work around the problems in slang's
curses emulation, unfortunately.