[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nano-devel] [PATCH] Some improvements to the c syntax
From: |
Benno Schulenberg |
Subject: |
Re: [Nano-devel] [PATCH] Some improvements to the c syntax |
Date: |
Sun, 10 Dec 2017 15:38:24 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0 |
Op 10-12-17 om 14:50 schreef Liu Hao:
On 2017/12/10 21:11, Benno Schulenberg wrote:
I think #define should not color what comes after it.
This does not seem practically possible. I tried moving the rule for MACROs
after this rule but it turned out that every occurrence got colored - not only
those following `#define` immediately, but those inside the macro body.
I don't understand what you mean. Do you mean #define inside a macro
body gets colored and you don't want it to be?
Anyway, to test the patch, I look at these two locations:
nano +52 src/nano.h
nano +797 src/global.c
For the first one, the stuff after the #define is valid C, so it
should be colored as C. And thus it should be this way for all
#defines. For the second case, both lines of the #if should be
colored. The symbols used in the #ifs, #ifdefs and #ifndefs are
not really part of the program, they are configuration, so I like
it when they are not colored as if they were program symbols.
Together with #else and #endif it should be in a single-line color command.
Maybe also #include should be in the single-line one?
This will require two rules, one of which is for the single-line and the other
is multiple-line. I have attached an alternative patch for this.
Yes. I propose instead the upcoming patch.
Benno
- [Nano-devel] [PATCH] Some improvements, Liu Hao, 2017/12/06
- Re: [Nano-devel] [PATCH] Some improvements, Liu Hao, 2017/12/07
- Re: [Nano-devel] [PATCH] Some improvements, Liu Hao, 2017/12/07
- Re: [Nano-devel] [PATCH] Some improvements, Benno Schulenberg, 2017/12/07
- Re: [Nano-devel] [PATCH] Some improvements, Liu Hao, 2017/12/07
- Re: [Nano-devel] [PATCH] Some improvements, Benno Schulenberg, 2017/12/09
- Re: [Nano-devel] [PATCH] Some improvements, Liu Hao, 2017/12/10
- Re: [Nano-devel] [PATCH] Some improvements, Benno Schulenberg, 2017/12/10
- Re: [Nano-devel] [PATCH] Some improvements, Liu Hao, 2017/12/10
- Re: [Nano-devel] [PATCH] Some improvements to the c syntax,
Benno Schulenberg <=
- Re: [Nano-devel] [PATCH] Some improvements to the c syntax, Liu Hao, 2017/12/10
- Re: [Nano-devel] [PATCH] Some improvements to the c syntax, Benno Schulenberg, 2017/12/11
- Re: [Nano-devel] [PATCH] Some improvements to the c syntax, Liu Hao, 2017/12/11
Re: [Nano-devel] [PATCH] Some improvements, Benno Schulenberg, 2017/12/07