[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Nano-devel] posix_spawn()

From: Benno Schulenberg
Subject: Re: [Nano-devel] posix_spawn()
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2018 09:54:49 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0

Hi Aron,

[*Please answer to the list, not to me.*]

Op 09-07-18 om 07:16 schreef Barath Aron:
> I do not agree completely. I'm talking about only the posix_spawn() 
> transition,
> which is actually almost complete. I've developed my patches on Arch Linux, 
> until
> it worked, so the patch is 100% Linux-compatible (since both pthread and
> posix_spawn() are POSIX). It is not about "that" operating system. Just to be
> clear my situation. :)
> The only reason I wanted to submit the patches is that I do not intended to
> diverge from the mainline, and for easier further changes adaption. :/

Well... if it were a three-line patch, no problem.  And maybe even a ten-line
patch I would have grudgingly accepted.  But a big messy patch that adds more
than a hundred lines...  No.  Plus: I would have to learn about posix_spawn()
because I will have to maintain this stuff.  I have other things to do.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]