[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 1/4] rcfile: accept prefix "lit" to make a color brighter wit
From: |
Benno Schulenberg |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 1/4] rcfile: accept prefix "lit" to make a color brighter without bolding it |
Date: |
Fri, 12 Jun 2020 10:49:29 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.0 |
Op 12-06-2020 om 00:26 schreef Saagar Jha:
> The word “lit” specifically has a fairly interesting colloquial meaning; I
> might even go as far to say that the usage of the word in that context might
> outstrip its use conveying the meaning you’re trying to evoke.
You're referring to "lit" as short for "literature"?
> While it’s a couple more characters, personally I prefer “lightred” over
> “litred” from a clarity/phonesthetic perspective.
I wanted to use a word that shares as few as possible letters with "bright"
so that it is easy to distinguish the two. At first I used "live", but that
doesn't work well in "livered". If it wasn't for that, I think "live" would
have been good.
Indeed, "light" probably most clearly conveys the meaning. If no one finds
a better word, I will switch over to "light".
Benno
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [PATCH 1/4] rcfile: accept prefix "lit" to make a color brighter without bolding it, Saagar Jha, 2020/06/11
- Re: [PATCH 1/4] rcfile: accept prefix "lit" to make a color brighter without bolding it,
Benno Schulenberg <=