[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh updates
From: |
Ken Hornstein |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh updates |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Oct 2004 10:54:50 -0400 |
>For many projects, the Way It Is Done is to have the *.in files in the
>tree, and expect that anybody working with the CVS tree has the autofoo stuff
>installed - and autoconf/automake/etc get run just before cutting a
>release tarball. Is that what we *intended* to do?
Yes, absolutely. And just for the record, there's no config.h in the CVS
tree. config.h only appears after you run configure (it's generated from
config.h.in, which is in turn generated by autoheader).
--Ken
- [Nmh-workers] PATCH: `repl -annotate` broken in 1.1RC{2,3}, Gurusamy Sarathy, 2004/10/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] PATCH: `repl -annotate` broken in 1.1RC{2,3}, Christer Boräng, 2004/10/07
- [Nmh-workers] nmh updates, Jon Steinhart, 2004/10/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh updates, Valdis . Kletnieks, 2004/10/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh updates,
Ken Hornstein <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh updates, Oliver Kiddle, 2004/10/13
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh updates, Ken Hornstein, 2004/10/13
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh updates, Jon Steinhart, 2004/10/13
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh updates, Ken Hornstein, 2004/10/13
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh updates, Jon Steinhart, 2004/10/13
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh updates, Michael Richardson, 2004/10/13
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh updates, Ken Hornstein, 2004/10/13
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh updates, Robert Elz, 2004/10/13
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh updates, Ralph Corderoy, 2004/10/13