Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh current development

[Oliver Kiddle]

Josh Bressers wrote:
> I must admit that I've not paid a lot of attention to this list in the
> past, so I'm hoping someone can fill me in on some details here.  I
> submitted a few somewhat lame patches on savannah a bit over a week ago.
> My purpose in doing this was to test the waters a bit to see if development
> is as stagnant as it appears, the last commit to CVS is 2 months old.  I've
> had zero feedback so far.

I hadn't noticed the patches which is a bit the problem with using
trackers such as those on Savannah. I personally think it is better to
have patches posted to the mailing list where they can be discussed. If
nobody objects to them, they should then be commit to CVS.

> Without trying to start a flamewar here, does the current development team
> still have any interest in this codebase?

I certainly have an interest in it because I use it. I would also happily
handle releases if Ken wants to hand over that job. The current situation
where 1.1 is released but unannounced and contains a serious bug (broken
repl annotation) is certainly not ideal.

Oliver