[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Nmh-workers] Re: unit and acceptance tests
|
From: |
Bill Wohler |
|
Subject: |
[Nmh-workers] Re: unit and acceptance tests |
|
Date: |
Wed, 18 Jan 2006 15:47:30 -0800 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Joel Uckelman <address@hidden> writes:
> If we're going to go through the trouble of cleaning up the codebase,
> we should really have a test framework. I'd like to start in on such
> a beast.
That's a really great idea. So then you'll know when you replace a
library function, you've have botched up all the commands.
Bourne shell is sufficient. After all, you'll pretty much only be
using diff on expected outputs anyway ;-).
--
Bill Wohler <address@hidden> http://www.newt.com/wohler/ GnuPG ID:610BD9AD
Maintainer of comp.mail.mh FAQ and MH-E. Vote Libertarian!
If you're passed on the right, you're in the wrong lane.