nmh-workers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Nmh-workers] mh-e support in nmh


From: Jeffrey Honig
Subject: Re: [Nmh-workers] mh-e support in nmh
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 22:12:40 -0500

On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 21:51, Jeffrey Honig <address@hidden> wrote:

On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 21:34, Ken Hornstein <address@hidden> wrote:
So I've been looking at removing crud in nmh's autoconf support and mass
of #ifdefs, and I came across the --enable-mhe option.

This defines MHE during the build, and it enables a few bits of MHE
support (some commands get a -build switch, and inc does some extra stuff).

The default has been to build with mh-e support, and I suspect that very
few people have NOT built nmh with mh-e support so I doubt that it is
causing many problems.  I propose removing the configure option and associated
#ifdefs so that mh-e support is always included in nmh.  Comments?


I'd like to audit them and see if we actually use them (we being mh-e developers).  Features that are actually used should always be enabled *and* documented.

Well, that was easy...

The code in inc.c, rnf,cm folder_read.c and mh-profile.man is some audit log stuff not used by mh-e (special audit file).

The -build option in forw.c and repl.c *are* used by mh-e.  The documentation for those flags would need to be cleaned up.

Thanks

Jeff

-- 
Jeffrey C. Honig <address@hidden>
http://www.honig.net/jch
GnuPG ID:14E29E13 <http://www.honig.net/jch/key.shtml>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]