[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Poor behavior of %(putaddr)
|
From: |
Ralph Corderoy |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Poor behavior of %(putaddr) |
|
Date: |
Fri, 13 Jan 2012 23:32:56 +0000 |
Hi Ken,
> Suggestions on a good solution? Fixing the format
> scanner code so it behaves better is a possibility (but I'm not
> sure what "better" is in this case), but I am wondering if the
> format code should kick out an error when it runs into this situation.
Either error, or treat it as the minimum width required for this
particular address, i.e. don't crop or pad it?
Cheers, Ralph.