[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] date math
From: |
David Levine |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] date math |
Date: |
Mon, 15 Dec 2014 22:59:51 -0500 |
Ken writes:
> That's fair enough, although the original MH developers did not
> think it was useless; the code to get this information existed back
> then.
If it's this code:
"GMT", "BST", 0,
"EST", "EDT", -5,
"CST", "CDT", -6,
"MST", "MDT", -7,
"PST", "PDT", -8,
"JST", "JDT", 2,
(and single letters for all the other standard times)
I don't believe it supports your statement about the original MH
developers' thoughts.
> So that makes me wonder if we should still try to bother to generate
> a symbolic timezone name. It looks like the only portable way to do
> this is to have an internal list of timezone names.
You really want to maintain that?
> A large part of me says to not bother.
Good :-) I agree with Lyndon that we shouldn't.
David
--
https://email-quarantine.google.com/messagecenter
--
https://email-quarantine.google.com/messagecenter
- Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, hymie, 2014/12/17
- Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, David Levine, 2014/12/16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2014/12/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, Ken Hornstein, 2014/12/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2014/12/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, Bill Wohler, 2014/12/16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] date math,
David Levine <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] date math, Ralph Corderoy, 2014/12/16