[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] mhfixmsg on a pathological mail
From: |
Ralph Corderoy |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] mhfixmsg on a pathological mail |
Date: |
Fri, 18 Aug 2017 15:11:07 +0100 |
Hi Håkon,
> $ mhlist -version
> mhlist -- nmh-1.7-RC2 built 2017-08-18 11:32:04 +0000 on garbo
> $ mhlist 1
> mhlist: bogus multipart content in message 1
> msg part type/subtype size description
> 1 multipart/mixed 32K
And yet I got
> > $ mhlist -file 9707.2.email
> > msg part type/subtype size description
> > 9707 multipart/mixed 31K
Which is smaller. Update: You pointed out the carriage returns. Can
you send the problem email as a .tar.gz or something that will leave
everything alone.
> compiler flags : -g -ansi -pedantic...
That was recently relaxed on master to from ANSI to C99.
> checking for lockfile_create in -llockfile... yes
> sbr/lock_file.c:587:54: warning: unused parameter ‘isnewlock’
> [-Wunused-parameter]
I've just pushed bb8a2556 that stops this warning.
> sbr/fmt_scan.c:76:13: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned
> integer expressions [-Wsign-compare]
That was fixed recently. Looks like more commits might need
cherry-picking across to the 1.7-release branch.
> 11.tar: unknown suffix -- unchanged
> tar: This does not look like a tar archive
> tar: Exiting with failure status due to previous errors
> FAIL: test/post/test-sendfiles
This is odd. Can you give any insight? Or after it fails, try «script
-c 'sh -x test/post/test-sendfiles'» and pass us ./typescript.
--
Cheers, Ralph.
https://plus.google.com/+RalphCorderoy
- [Nmh-workers] mhfixmsg on a pathological mail, Håkon Alstadheim, 2017/08/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhfixmsg on a pathological mail, Ralph Corderoy, 2017/08/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhfixmsg on a pathological mail, Håkon Alstadheim, 2017/08/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhfixmsg on a pathological mail, Håkon Alstadheim, 2017/08/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhfixmsg on a pathological mail,
Ralph Corderoy <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhfixmsg on a pathological mail, Håkon Alstadheim, 2017/08/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhfixmsg on a pathological mail, Ralph Corderoy, 2017/08/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhfixmsg on a pathological mail, Ken Hornstein, 2017/08/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhfixmsg on a pathological mail, Håkon Alstadheim, 2017/08/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhfixmsg on a pathological mail, Ken Hornstein, 2017/08/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhfixmsg on a pathological mail, Ralph Corderoy, 2017/08/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhfixmsg on a pathological mail, Håkon Alstadheim, 2017/08/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhfixmsg on a pathological mail, Ken Hornstein, 2017/08/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhfixmsg on a pathological mail, Ralph Corderoy, 2017/08/19
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhfixmsg on a pathological mail, Paul Fox, 2017/08/19