[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Reply-to header in my replcoms
From: |
Robert Elz |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Reply-to header in my replcoms |
Date: |
Mon, 21 Aug 2017 02:34:25 +0700 |
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2017 08:56:28 -0700
From: address@hidden
Message-ID: <address@hidden>
| I am attaching what I believe to be the replcomps I'm using. How should I
| modify it?
Delete the Reply-To: (or at least the default value). Reply-To
headers should only ever be added when you have a particular need,
nothing that simply adds them with a default value is ever rational
(and unless you actually intend to request replies to be sent only to
you, and not to any other addresses, having the Reply-To be the same
as From is just plain silly ... with some crappy MUAs Reply-To was the
only way to (kind of) override what the MUA insisted upon for From, but
for that to make sense the reply-to value would be different from From)
For this reply I had to manually add the cc line to the list, as my
replcomps (my default replcomps) will send to the addresses in a
Reply-To header, and no-where else, if that header exists.
kre
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhstore dumps core, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhstore dumps core, David Levine, 2017/08/20
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhstore dumps core, David Levine, 2017/08/20
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhstore dumps core, Ralph Corderoy, 2017/08/20
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhstore dumps core, David Levine, 2017/08/20
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhstore dumps core, Ralph Corderoy, 2017/08/20
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhstore dumps core, Ralph Corderoy, 2017/08/20
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhstore dumps core, Ken Hornstein, 2017/08/23
- [Nmh-workers] Reply-to header in my replcoms, norm, 2017/08/20
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Reply-to header in my replcoms, Ken Hornstein, 2017/08/23
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Reply-to header in my replcoms, norm, 2017/08/23
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Reply-to header in my replcoms,
Robert Elz <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Reply-to header in my replcoms, norm, 2017/08/21
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Reply-to header in my replcoms, Robert Elz, 2017/08/21