[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP/nmh, again
From: |
Ralph Corderoy |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP/nmh, again |
Date: |
Fri, 27 Oct 2017 22:29:32 +0100 |
Hi Valdis,
> 0 [~] time bash -c '(scan +linux-kernel 1-10426 > /dev/null)'
>
> real 0m17.625s
> user 0m1.610s
> sys 0m3.358s
What does `scan -version' give?
Is 1-10426 actually 10,426 emails? :-)
If you have grep(1) read the files up to the end of the headers instead,
does it still take as long? Something like
pick -list +linux-kernel 1-10426 >/tmp/to-grep
cd `mhpath +linux-kernel`
# Clear the cache, as before.
time xargs grep -m1 ^$ </tmp/to-grep >/dev/null
It does look like it's all I/O bound. I've had some success in the past
reading the emails in disk-address-of-first-byte order instead of nmh's
filename-as-a-number.
--
Cheers, Ralph.
https://plus.google.com/+RalphCorderoy
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP/nmh, again, (continued)
Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP/nmh, again, Ralph Corderoy, 2017/10/26
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP/nmh, again, Ken Hornstein, 2017/10/26
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP/nmh, again, Ralph Corderoy, 2017/10/27
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP/nmh, again, Ken Hornstein, 2017/10/27
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP/nmh, again, valdis . kletnieks, 2017/10/27
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP/nmh, again, Ken Hornstein, 2017/10/27
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP/nmh, again,
Ralph Corderoy <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP/nmh, again, valdis . kletnieks, 2017/10/27
Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP/nmh, again, Ralph Corderoy, 2017/10/27
Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP/nmh, again, Michael Richardson, 2017/10/26