[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: text/calendar vs application/ics
From: |
David Levine |
Subject: |
Re: text/calendar vs application/ics |
Date: |
Tue, 07 Jan 2020 19:16:42 -0500 |
Ken writes:
> Other than 'sed -e s#application/ics#text/calendar#', no. I was hoping
> mhfixmsg could do that, but it seems like right now it cannot
That's right. See below for an example of where I think doing that would be
less than helpful.
> You COULD complain to meetup.com; sending out application/ics is total crap.
Google sends it out, along with an (almost) identical text/calendar:
msg part type/subtype size description
0 multipart/mixed 14K
1 multipart/alternative 12K
1.1 text/calendar 1263
1.2 text/html 8233
1.3 text/plain 1173
2 application/ics 1295
disposition "attachment"
The only difference between the text/calendar and application/ics content is
the line endings, the same as Conrad found (\r\n in the application/ics).
David
- text/calendar vs application/ics, Conrad Hughes, 2020/01/07
- Re: text/calendar vs application/ics, Ralph Corderoy, 2020/01/07
- Re: text/calendar vs application/ics, Conrad Hughes, 2020/01/07
- Re: text/calendar vs application/ics, Ken Hornstein, 2020/01/07
- Re: text/calendar vs application/ics, Conrad Hughes, 2020/01/07
- Re: text/calendar vs application/ics, Ken Hornstein, 2020/01/07
- Re: text/calendar vs application/ics, Paul Fox, 2020/01/07
- Re: text/calendar vs application/ics, Ken Hornstein, 2020/01/07
- Re: text/calendar vs application/ics, Paul Fox, 2020/01/07
- Re: text/calendar vs application/ics,
David Levine <=
- Re: text/calendar vs application/ics, Ralph Corderoy, 2020/01/08
- Re: text/calendar vs application/ics, David Levine, 2020/01/07
Re: text/calendar vs application/ics, Ken Hornstein, 2020/01/07
Re: text/calendar vs application/ics, Michael Richardson, 2020/01/07