[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 1.8RC2?
|
From: |
David Levine |
|
Subject: |
Re: 1.8RC2? |
|
Date: |
Sun, 29 Jan 2023 05:45:46 -0800 |
Alexander wrote:
> debian: works well. however, 1.8 might not make it into the upcoming
> release (upload freeze is just weeks away and one nmh-dependent package
> has a test suite bug that blocks nmh from going in...
> https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=nmh)
It looks like that dependent package is xbiff. Do you know how that
is identified as a dependecy? I don't see it as an explicit
dependency in nmh itself.
David
- 1.8RC2?, David Levine, 2023/01/28
- Re: 1.8RC2?, Alexander Zangerl, 2023/01/28
- Re: 1.8RC2?,
David Levine <=
- Re: 1.8RC2?, Ralph Corderoy, 2023/01/29
- Re: 1.8RC2?, David Levine, 2023/01/29
- Re: 1.8RC2?, Alexander Zangerl, 2023/01/29
- nmh 1.8RC2, xlbiff, and $HOME, Stephen Gildea, 2023/01/30
- Re: nmh 1.8RC2, xlbiff, and $HOME, Kevin Cosgrove, 2023/01/30
- Re: nmh 1.8RC2, xlbiff, and $HOME, Alexander Zangerl, 2023/01/30
- Re: nmh 1.8RC2, xlbiff, and $HOME, Ralph Corderoy, 2023/01/31
- Re: nmh 1.8RC2, xlbiff, and $HOME, Ken Hornstein, 2023/01/31
- Re: nmh 1.8RC2, xlbiff, and $HOME, Ralph Corderoy, 2023/01/31
- Re: nmh 1.8RC2, xlbiff, and $HOME, Bakul Shah, 2023/01/31