[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #30481] cquad integrator, Octave and Oct-File
From: |
Pedro Gonnet |
Subject: |
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #30481] cquad integrator, Octave and Oct-File sources |
Date: |
Wed, 08 Sep 2010 09:54:46 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US) AppleWebKit/534.3 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/6.0.472.53 Safari/534.3 |
Follow-up Comment #6, bug #30481 (project octave):
I wouldn't... Although cquad is more reliable, the QUADPACK routines are
usually more efficient for functions that are well-behaved, i.e. have no
singularities, discontinuities or other surprises.
Replacing them may cause a flood of "quad is all of a sudden much slower for
my function!" bug reports.
Cheers, Pedro
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?30481>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #30481] cquad integrator, Octave and Oct-File sources, Jaroslav Hajek, 2010/09/03
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #30481] cquad integrator, Octave and Oct-File sources, David Bateman, 2010/09/06
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #30481] cquad integrator, Octave and Oct-File sources, Jaroslav Hajek, 2010/09/06
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #30481] cquad integrator, Octave and Oct-File sources, David Bateman, 2010/09/08
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #30481] cquad integrator, Octave and Oct-File sources,
Pedro Gonnet <=
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #30481] cquad integrator, Octave and Oct-File sources, David Bateman, 2010/09/08
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #30481] cquad integrator, Octave and Oct-File sources, Pedro Gonnet, 2010/09/14