[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #31730] chebwin() function gives wildly differ
From: |
anonymous |
Subject: |
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #31730] chebwin() function gives wildly different results from matlab with low values of the 'at' parameter |
Date: |
Mon, 22 Nov 2010 12:42:32 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.0.19) Gecko/2010102809 Iceweasel/3.0.6 (Debian-3.0.6-3) |
URL:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?31730>
Summary: chebwin() function gives wildly different results
from matlab with low values of the 'at' parameter
Project: GNU Octave
Submitted by: None
Submitted on: Mon 22 Nov 2010 12:42:31 PM UTC
Category: Libraries
Severity: 3 - Normal
Priority: 5 - Normal
Item Group: Incorrect Result
Status: None
Assigned to: None
Originator Name: Sidney Cadot
Originator Email:
Open/Closed: Open
Discussion Lock: Any
Release: 3.2.4
Operating System: GNU/Linux
_______________________________________________________
Details:
In Octave:
octave:1> chebwin(10, 10.0)
ans =
2.24051
0.80130
0.89683
0.96473
1.00000
1.00000
0.96473
0.89683
0.80130
2.24051
Matlab:
>> chebwin(10, 10.0)
ans =
1.0000
0.3576
0.4003
0.4306
0.4463
0.4463
0.4306
0.4003
0.3576
1.0000
It is unclear to me which of these results is correct, I hope that someone
with more signal processing experience will be able to establish that.
The problem occurs mainly when the attenuation parameter is not too high. For
at >= 100, for example, the differences become negligible.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?31730>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #31730] chebwin() function gives wildly different results from matlab with low values of the 'at' parameter,
anonymous <=