[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #37613] Octave precision/accuracy is much lowe

From: David Bateman
Subject: [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #37613] Octave precision/accuracy is much lower for quadgk
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 20:26:56 +0000
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/16.0

Follow-up Comment #7, bug #37613 (project octave):

Yes I think you're right the simplification will give the same results much

In fact I'm no longer testing the minimum relative size of an interval, but
rather the minimum distance between abscissa, since as you said the
"arguments" mentioned by Shampine probably mean the distance between abscissa
or evaluation points rather than the sub-interval length. 

The test is also after the conversion from the transformed interval to the
real evaluation points so I'm testing in the interval (a, b).



Reply to this item at:


  Message sent via/by Savannah

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]