Re: [Octave-bug-tracker] Question of JITC

[Michael D. Godfrey]

On 08/11/2013 01:53 PM, Max Brister wrote:
> That would be good. I'm not sure what the problem is. Picking which
> libraries to link to hasn't changed since llvm 3.1. We just use
> llvm-config.
I looked at this a bit more.  It appears that the only method may be:
1. Use llvm-config --libdir  to find the library directory.
2. Test for the needed *.so files in that directory.  Is libLLVM-3.3.so
    all that is needed?
3. Set the right options for the linker.

I have no idea why llvm-config --libnames produces the same output whether
the static libraries are installed of not, and anyhow only reports the
static libraries.

How did this work in 3.1?  Have you found a better way for 3.3?

Michael