[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #44152] print("plot_file.pdf") generates warni
From: |
Rik |
Subject: |
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #44152] print("plot_file.pdf") generates warning message |
Date: |
Fri, 24 Apr 2015 05:16:43 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:37.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/37.0 |
Follow-up Comment #1, bug #44152 (project octave):
The relevant lines from __print_parse_opts__.m
if (warn_on_missing_binary)
if (isempty (arg_st.ghostscript.binary))
warning ("print:missing_gs", "print.m: Ghostscript binary is not
available.\nOnly eps output is available.");
else
if (isempty (arg_st.epstool_binary))
warning ("print:missing_epstool", "print.m: epstool binary is not
available.\nSome output formats are not available.");
endif
if (isempty (arg_st.fig2dev_binary))
warning ("print:missing_fig2dev", "print.m: fig2dev binary is not
available.\nSome output formats are not available.");
endif
if (isempty (arg_st.pstoedit_binary))
warning ("print:missing_pstoedit", "print.m: pstoedit binary is not
available.\nSome output formats are not available.");
endif
endif
warn_on_missing_binary = false;
endif
Should we get rid of all of these messages entirely and just use the error
reporting that will happen if you try to print something that requires a
missing binary?
Or maybe we should keep the first one because Ghostscript is pretty crucial to
most of the printing.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?44152>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #44152] print("plot_file.pdf") generates warning message,
Rik <=