[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #44315] sparse-times-single operators unimplemented

[Lachlan Andrew]

Follow-up Comment #4, bug #44315 (project octave):

As Jordi said, it is unlikely that Octave will add a sparse-single type. 
Although it is a "fixed" Matlab, it shouldn't become bloated.

What type should sparse*single return?  If the single is a scalar, then I
suppose a sparse is best, but if the single is a matrix, then I suppose a
single matrix is best.  Is that right?

    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?44315>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.gnu.org/