octave-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #47058] citation command: @book or @booklet ?


From: Rik
Subject: [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #47058] citation command: @book or @booklet ?
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 13:56:00 +0000 (UTC)
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:43.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/43.0

Update of bug #47058 (project octave):

                  Status:               Need Info => Fixed                  
             Open/Closed:                    Open => Closed                 

    _______________________________________________________

Follow-up Comment #4:

I updated the CITATION text to use @manual since that appears more correct. 
According to BiBtex a manual could use the following syntax.


@manual{manual,
  title        = {The title of the work},
  author       = {Peter Gainsford}, 
  organization = {The organization},
  address      = {The address of the publisher},
  edition      = 3,
  month        = 7,
  year         = 1993,
  note         = {An optional note}
}


I used


  @manual{,
    title     = {{GNU Octave} version 4.2.0 manual: a high-level interactive
language for numerical computations},
    author    = {John W. Eaton, David Bateman, S\oren Hauberg, and Rik
Wehbring},
    year      = {2016},
    url       = {http://www.gnu.org/software/octave/doc/interpreter},
  }


I think this should be good enough, but I don't write academic papers.  If
someone who does feels it is important to have the organization, address, and
edition fields then they can prepare a cset for that.


    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?47058>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.gnu.org/




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]