[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #47058] citation command: @book or @booklet ?
From: |
Rik |
Subject: |
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #47058] citation command: @book or @booklet ? |
Date: |
Wed, 7 Sep 2016 13:56:00 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:43.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/43.0 |
Update of bug #47058 (project octave):
Status: Need Info => Fixed
Open/Closed: Open => Closed
_______________________________________________________
Follow-up Comment #4:
I updated the CITATION text to use @manual since that appears more correct.
According to BiBtex a manual could use the following syntax.
@manual{manual,
title = {The title of the work},
author = {Peter Gainsford},
organization = {The organization},
address = {The address of the publisher},
edition = 3,
month = 7,
year = 1993,
note = {An optional note}
}
I used
@manual{,
title = {{GNU Octave} version 4.2.0 manual: a high-level interactive
language for numerical computations},
author = {John W. Eaton, David Bateman, S\oren Hauberg, and Rik
Wehbring},
year = {2016},
url = {http://www.gnu.org/software/octave/doc/interpreter},
}
I think this should be good enough, but I don't write academic papers. If
someone who does feels it is important to have the organization, address, and
edition fields then they can prepare a cset for that.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?47058>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #47058] citation command: @book or @booklet ?,
Rik <=