[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #45171] isequal fails for large sparse matrice

From: Carlo de Falco
Subject: [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #45171] isequal fails for large sparse matrices (subscript indixes too large)
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 11:05:32 +0000 (UTC)
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:48.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/48.0

Follow-up Comment #2, bug #45171 (project octave):

This patch was being discussed on IRC yesterday,
when my connection went suddenly off, I'll
continue the discussion here.

Just before communication was interrupted jwe asked:

<jwe> cdf: in that last one, is length the right thing to apply to x?  That's
a strange function because it returns the larger of the number of rows or

My answer would have been:

I would say *length* is equivalent to *numel* in this context because *find*
should always return vectors, as noted in its

But if you prefer it I see no problem in replacing *length* by *numel* in the

Also note that the use of *length* was there before this change.


Reply to this item at:


  Message sent via/by Savannah

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]