|
From: | John W. Eaton |
Subject: | [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #50359] clearer documentation for difference between isnull and isempty |
Date: | Thu, 23 Feb 2017 09:21:13 -0500 (EST) |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/45.0 |
Follow-up Comment #7, bug #50359 (project octave): The whole reason this special type was added to Octave was to handle the (crazy?) difference between x(idx) = []; and t = []; x(idx) = t; This seems reasonably clear to me from the example in the docstring for isnull. _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?50359> _______________________________________________ Message sent via/by Savannah http://savannah.gnu.org/
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |