[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #53258] test pcg.m fail

[Carlo de Falco]

Follow-up Comment #21, bug #53258 (project octave):

Rik, I agree that it is inefficient to keep working on the old version of the
code.

So, is it OK if I merge Cristiano's branch into default now 
and we keep working there?

You can see the complete set of changes here:
https://bitbucket.org/cdf1/octave/branch/dorigo#diff

These are all the files touched:

doc/interpreter/linalg.txi
scripts/sparse/bicg.m
scripts/sparse/bicgstab.m
scripts/sparse/cgs.m
scripts/sparse/gmres.m
scripts/sparse/ilu.m
scripts/sparse/module.mk
scripts/sparse/pcg.m
scripts/sparse/private/__alltohandles__.m
scripts/sparse/private/__default__input__.m
scripts/sparse/tfqmr.m

it doesn't really look too invasive, I think
we can review and finalize the changes in a 
codesprint next week.


notice that this will override your changes to test
from changeset 96c74e33d17a but I think it's easier
to re-apply them manually also considering that similar
changes may also be needed for the 12 new BIST in pcg 
and for the BIST in other solvers.

    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?53258>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.gnu.org/