[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #58926] Octave gives wrong results with intel-mkl when diagonalizing large matrices

[Archisman Panigrahi]

Follow-up Comment #15, bug #58926 (project octave):

[comment #14 comment #14:]
> So at the moment, MKL is broken. Not the first time; I am pretty sure not
the last time. Why would we need to document this in the manual? 
> 
> Dmitri.
> -- 
> 

@Dmitri

Octave + BLAS/OpenBLAS --> produces correct result
Octave + MKL --> produces incorrect result
Scilab + MKL --> produces correct result (Someone confirmed in a comment in
https://askubuntu.com/a/1265802/124466)
Fortran + MKL --> produces correct result (Someone confirmed in
https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-oneAPI-Math-Kernel-Library/GNU-Octave-gives-different-results-with-MKL/m-p/1198890/highlight/true#M29885)



    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?58926>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via Savannah
  https://savannah.gnu.org/