|
From: | Hartmut |
Subject: | [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #59022] [octave forge] (image) test failures in blockproc.m under Octave 6.0.90 |
Date: | Thu, 27 Aug 2020 17:20:24 -0400 (EDT) |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:80.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/80.0 |
Follow-up Comment #5, bug #59022 (project octave): The email list comment from comment #4 suggests to use is_function_handle() to check. But this gives FALSE in Octave 6.0.90 for the return object of inline.m, and it gives TRUE in Octave 5.2.0. Maybe we should * change the 10 test cases to use an anonymous function instead of the inline thing. * change the input checking code to do the check via is_function_handle() instead of comparing class names to string values Doing this would break old user code that uses inline objects with blockproc.m. So maybe this is not the best solution. Any better idea? _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?59022> _______________________________________________ Message sent via Savannah https://savannah.gnu.org/
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |