[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #59273] [octave forge] (io) can't load XLSX files after chk_spreadsheet_support in 2.6.2

[Sébastien Villemot]

Follow-up Comment #2, bug #59273 (project octave):

[comment #1 commentaire #1 :]

> In your post I do not see "POI (& OOXML)" in xlsopen.m's output but just
"POI". That implies that only .xls support for POI is active, not .xlsx. What
does your javaclasspath look like after the call to chk_spreadheet_support?
BTW the ouput of chk_spreadsheet_support is a bit mask indicating which
interfaces have been successfully checked. 74 as in your post hints at
incomplete POI initialization.

For my Debian packaging work, I use several containers, which don’t
necessarily have the same set of Java libraries installed. Hence the
discrepancy between the body of my post (bitmask 74) and the log file I
attached (bitmask 78). The problem occurs in both cases.

> On my box I see Java complaints during POI initialization about a
"reflective error" or so (bug #58266) and the threat to disable that in future
Java implementations. Do you have newer Java where they actually did so?

I don’t see that error message. All my tests were performed using Debian
unstable, which defaults to OpenJDK 11.

> In the entries for OCT there's a "subscripts must be either integers 1 to
(2^63)-1 or logicals" error. That leads me to the following:
> Can you try replacing L.131 in xlopen.m,
>       reqinterface = [];
> by
>       reqinterface = "";
> try again and and report back?

I applied this changes and the problem persists (I attach the log, the summary
table at the end is the same as the previous one, but the error messages
slightly differ, as you can see with a text diff tool).


(file #49982)
    _______________________________________________________

Additional Item Attachment:

File name: io-xlsopen-patched-L131.log    Size:5 KB
   
<https://file.savannah.gnu.org/file/io-xlsopen-patched-L131.log?file_id=49982>



    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?59273>

_______________________________________________
  Message posté via Savannah
  https://savannah.gnu.org/