[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #60237] Differente behaviour in anonymous function handling

[anonymous]

Follow-up Comment #28, bug #60237 (project octave):

Re: comment #27. I agree with that. But the case in comment #25 is different
issue:
It seems that if a nested function (that captures mutable variables by
reference) is called form an anonymous function (that captures immutable
variables by value) it is converted to a handle to a nested function (that
captures mutable variables by value).
So the expression `r = @() bm (a);` is treated as `r = @() (@bm) (a);` as the
result of test case in comment #25 results in [2 3]. That is very
interesting!



    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?60237>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via Savannah
  https://savannah.gnu.org/