[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #62358] Performance of Matrix Multiplication s
From: |
Arun Giridhar |
Subject: |
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #62358] Performance of Matrix Multiplication significantly slower in 7.1.0 compared to 6.1.0 |
Date: |
Mon, 25 Apr 2022 10:07:51 -0400 (EDT) |
Follow-up Comment #7, bug #62358 (project octave):
@jwe, since the OpenBlas library is the same across all Octave versions for
me, I ascribed the difference in performance to a mix of interpreter speed and
any other changes made to the libinterp library. To eliminate the "for i =
1:100" loop:
tic;
c = a*b; ## replicated 100 times
t = toc;
A variant with cputime is:
start = cputime;
c = a*b; ## replicated 100 times
finish = cputime;
t = finish - start;
mf(j) = 1999 * 100/t;
The trend is the same as before though. Octave 8.0.0 and 7.1.0 (no major
difference):
octave:3> bench_mmult_noloop
N = 1000
Method 2: MEAN GFLOPS single: 442.26854
Method 2: MAX GFLOPS single: 444.24100
Octave 6.1.0 and 6.4.0: (no major difference this time)
octave:3> bench_mmult_noloop
N = 1000
Method 2: MEAN GFLOPS single: 466.00226
Method 2: MAX GFLOPS single: 467.94603
The above were with tic/toc. The cputime variant gives lower numbers (divided
by the number of CPU cores roughly) but the trend is still the same, being 5%
to 7% slower for 7.1.0 compared to 6.4.0.
Bisection is difficult in the range from 6.4.0 to 7.1.0 because of changed
libraries or missing files like this one:
config.status: error: cannot find input file: `oct-conf-post-private.in.h'
Does anyone know how to work around that?
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?62358>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #62358] Performance of Matrix Multiplication significantly slower in 7.1.0 compared to 6.1.0, Stefan Schlögl, 2022/04/24
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #62358] Performance of Matrix Multiplication significantly slower in 7.1.0 compared to 6.1.0, Arun Giridhar, 2022/04/25
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #62358] Performance of Matrix Multiplication significantly slower in 7.1.0 compared to 6.1.0, Markus Mützel, 2022/04/25
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #62358] Performance of Matrix Multiplication significantly slower in 7.1.0 compared to 6.1.0, Arun Giridhar, 2022/04/25
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #62358] Performance of Matrix Multiplication significantly slower in 7.1.0 compared to 6.1.0, Stefan Schlögl, 2022/04/25
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #62358] Performance of Matrix Multiplication significantly slower in 7.1.0 compared to 6.1.0, Arun Giridhar, 2022/04/25
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #62358] Performance of Matrix Multiplication significantly slower in 7.1.0 compared to 6.1.0, John W. Eaton, 2022/04/25
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #62358] Performance of Matrix Multiplication significantly slower in 7.1.0 compared to 6.1.0,
Arun Giridhar <=
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #62358] Performance of Matrix Multiplication significantly slower in 7.1.0 compared to 6.1.0, John W. Eaton, 2022/04/25
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #62358] Performance of Matrix Multiplication significantly slower in 7.1.0 compared to 6.1.0, Arun Giridhar, 2022/04/25