[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] Add min/max tests. (4/4)
|
From: |
John W. Eaton |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] Add min/max tests. (4/4) |
|
Date: |
Fri, 8 Sep 2000 13:12:05 -0500 (CDT) |
On 8-Sep-2000, Paul Kienzle <address@hidden> wrote:
| A counter question: why would you ever want do_fortran_index == 0?
I believe I originally thought that using a single index to select
elements in column-major ordering might be exposing too much of the
underlying implementation. Now I'm not so sure. I'm willing to
reconsider, and perhaps just turn it into an optional warning.
jwe
- Re: [PATCH] Add min/max tests. (4/4), (continued)
- Re: [PATCH] Add min/max tests. (4/4), John W. Eaton, 2000/09/05
- Re: [PATCH] Add min/max tests. (4/4), John W. Eaton, 2000/09/06
- Re: [PATCH] Add min/max tests. (4/4), Edward Jason Riedy, 2000/09/13
- Re: [PATCH] Add min/max tests. (4/4), John W. Eaton, 2000/09/13
- Re: [PATCH] Add min/max tests. (4/4), Edward Jason Riedy, 2000/09/13
- Python (was: Re: [PATCH] Add min/max tests. (4/4)), John W. Eaton, 2000/09/13
- Re: Python (was: Re: [PATCH] Add min/max tests. (4/4)), Edward Jason Riedy, 2000/09/14
Re: [PATCH] Add min/max tests. (4/4), Paul Kienzle, 2000/09/07