[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ISO C++ and Octave
From: |
Mumit Khan |
Subject: |
Re: ISO C++ and Octave |
Date: |
Wed, 31 Jan 2001 10:19:06 -0600 (CST) |
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, John W. Eaton wrote:
> This seems to be a change in the way gcc works. Do you know the
> reason for the change? I see that with gcc 2.97, I can specify the
> targets with -MT "..." but that doesn't work with earlier versions of
> gcc.
I had missed the -MT option, thanks for pointing it out. Yet another
little thing that configure has to do.
Mumit
- ISO C++ and Octave, Mumit Khan, 2001/01/30
- ISO C++ and Octave, John W. Eaton, 2001/01/30
- Re: ISO C++ and Octave, Mumit Khan, 2001/01/30
- Re: ISO C++ and Octave, John W. Eaton, 2001/01/31
- Re: ISO C++ and Octave, Mumit Khan, 2001/01/31
- Re: ISO C++ and Octave, John W. Eaton, 2001/01/31
- Re: ISO C++ and Octave,
Mumit Khan <=
- Re: ISO C++ and Octave, John W. Eaton, 2001/01/31
- Re: ISO C++ and Octave, Mumit Khan, 2001/01/31
- Re: ISO C++ and Octave, Mumit Khan, 2001/01/31
- Re: ISO C++ and Octave, John W. Eaton, 2001/01/31
- Re: ISO C++ and Octave, Mumit Khan, 2001/01/31
- Re: ISO C++ and Octave, John W. Eaton, 2001/01/31
- Patch [Re: ISO C++ and Octave], Mumit Khan, 2001/01/31
- Re: ISO C++ and Octave, Mumit Khan, 2001/01/31
- Re: ISO C++ and Octave, Mumit Khan, 2001/01/31
Re: ISO C++ and Octave, Mumit Khan, 2001/01/30