|
From: | Dmitri A. Sergatskov |
Subject: | Re: Working patch for FFTW 3.0.x and Nd FFT's |
Date: | Wed, 18 Feb 2004 11:24:52 -0700 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040115 |
David Bateman wrote:
Why not the name fft_wisdom as opposed to fftw_wisdom? I realize that FFTW is being used, but if later some other FFT package is used then fft_wisdom could still apply. (I may have come in late on this discussion.)My original patch had fft_wisdom, John preferred fftw_wisdom. He has CVS write access, so he has the last say :-)
I do not know what was John reasonings, but since 'wisdom' is the FFTW3.x peculiarity it make sense (to me) to keep the reference in the name.
D.
Dmitri.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |