[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Depreciated Functions
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: Depreciated Functions |
Date: |
Mon, 19 Sep 2005 11:57:58 -0400 |
On 9-Sep-2005, Bill Denney wrote:
| On Wed, 7 Sep 2005, John W. Eaton wrote:
|
| > Yes, I think Octave should avoid using the deprecated functions
| > internally.
|
| I was looking through the other depreciated functions, and one that is not
| depreciated, but that does not fit with the naming of other functions is
| stdnormal_* (* = cdf, inv, pdf, rnd). Would you like to change the naming
| to stdnorm* instead and move the stdnormal_* versions to depreciated?
The reason for changing the names of these functions was to improve
compatibility. There doesn't seem to be a stdnorm function in Matlab,
so I'm not sure why we should change the name of the stdnormal_*
functions. See the following thread:
http://www.octave.org/octave-lists/archive/bug-octave.2005/msg00845.html
jwe
- Depreciated Functions, Bill Denney, 2005/09/07
- Depreciated Functions, John W. Eaton, 2005/09/07
- Re: Depreciated Functions, Paul Kienzle, 2005/09/07
- Re: Depreciated Functions, Bill Denney, 2005/09/08
- Re: Depreciated Functions, Paul Kienzle, 2005/09/08
- Re: Depreciated Functions, Quentin Spencer, 2005/09/09
- Re: Depreciated Functions, Paul Kienzle, 2005/09/09
- Re: Depreciated Functions, David Bateman, 2005/09/11
Re: Depreciated Functions, Bill Denney, 2005/09/09