[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Compiling octave-workshop
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: Compiling octave-workshop |
Date: |
Wed, 1 Mar 2006 15:14:12 -0500 |
On 1-Mar-2006, Sebastien Loisel wrote:
| >
| > OK, then I suggest that instead of doing things like parsing the
| > output of -v (which is fragile, as the output from -v could change in
| > the future and break your parser), you modify mkoctfile or
| > octave-config to do what you need and submit the changes.
|
| They're not generated?
Yes, they are generated from templates. Look at octave-config.in and
mkoctfile.in in the top-level source files. Rules to build them are
in octMakefile:
octave-config: octave-config.in Makeconf octMakefile
@$(do-subst-default-vals)
chmod a+rx $@
mkoctfile: mkoctfile.in Makeconf octMakefile
@$(do-subst-config-vals)
chmod a+rx $@
the do-subst-XXX-vals macros are defined in Makeconf.
| I was looking at the source for mkoctfile. It's not a too big patch, I
| think, except that if I do it, it might be slightly wrong and you'll have to
| fix it.
Submitting a patch would at least tell us precisely what feature(s)
you need.
jwe
- Re: Compiling octave-workshop, Sebastien Loisel, 2006/03/01
- Re: Compiling octave-workshop, John W. Eaton, 2006/03/01
- Re: Compiling octave-workshop, Quentin Spencer, 2006/03/01
- Re: Compiling octave-workshop, Sebastien Loisel, 2006/03/01
- Re: Compiling octave-workshop, John W. Eaton, 2006/03/01
- Re: Compiling octave-workshop, Sebastien Loisel, 2006/03/01
- Re: Compiling octave-workshop, John W. Eaton, 2006/03/01
- Re: Compiling octave-workshop, Sebastien Loisel, 2006/03/01
- Re: Compiling octave-workshop,
John W. Eaton <=
- Re: Compiling octave-workshop, Sebastien Loisel, 2006/03/01