Re: 2.9.5 and 2.1.73

[John W. Eaton]

On 16-Mar-2006, David Bateman wrote:

| > BTW, do you think it is time that we removed the *SSTREAM macros and
| > just assume that the C++ compiler has sstream?  I would expect that
| > any compiler that can build Octave will have that by now.
| 
| Your call. Though I'd suggest to leave it till after 2.9.5.

Sure, it doesn't need to be done immediately.  I just meant can you
see any reason that we would need to keep the code around?  Are there
any systems that we care about that have only the old non-standard
strstream classes?  My guess is no.

jwe